Bug 439395
Summary: | Explosive growth in abiword package | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
Component: | abiword | Assignee: | Marc Maurer <uwog> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-03-29 17:27:53 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 235706 |
Description
Jeremy Katz
2008-03-28 15:06:06 UTC
I _really_ want to prevent it to be split up. Ubuntu does this for example, and ubuntu users _still_ believe we do not have OpenDocument support. What we should do is investigate where the size changes comes from. If anything, it should be smaller (except for the Boost dependency), as we removed lots of old code in 2.6.0. What is the actual size diff anyway (can't check atm)? abiword grew by 22.45% (17682582->21653001) But yes, boost is the biggest offender -- because in addition to that growth, boost + all of its supporting stuff gets pulled in which costs us on the order of 20-25 megs Wow, didn't know we were the only user of boost :) The boost dependency is for the AbiCollab only (at least for 2.6.x, for 2.7 it will most likely be required for abiword-core). I'd hate to make it optional, as we suspect it will become one of our most important plugins. By making it optional, it will simply cease to exist for most people (as they are not aware of additional packages; we see that in all other distros all the time). Yep, boost actually isn't that widely used. Partially because its dep chain is somewhat ludicrous :-/ I can sympathize (somewhat) with your concern about people not knowing about it, but given that it's *packaged in separate source tarballs*, it's already somewhat off as far as the packaging guidelines are concerned. And there's just no fat left for trimming on the live images and due to a major version bump of abiword after the feature freeze, I've now gone from having breathing room to being over on space usage. About the separate source tarballs: it will all be a sane, single tarball again for abi 2.7.x. We are moving away from our old arcane source tarball, so the 4 seperate packages are just a transition phase only thingy. Otoh, I don't want to get you into trouble with your size issues. The only solution I see now is making the abicollab plugin a seperate package. I'll do this in an hour, unless you can come up with a more elegant solution :) Sorry for the trouble. Btw, other distro's split up boost in tons of packages. Isn't that the true proper solution? We only use about 0.1% of boost, so it's a bit silly to have to drag in 40MB of garbadge for that. We could also fork boost, and include the tiny fraction of code we actually use, but I'd rather not do that. Hmm, it seems we are only depending on the boost threading library: libboost_thread-mt.so.3 => /usr/lib/libboost_thread-mt.so.3 (0x0022c000) For the rest, we only use boost's templates, which obviously only have a compile time dependency. Lemme try removing the boost threading with pthreads. Other idea: I'll just link that libboost_thread lib statically. That will remove all runtime boost deps Fixed; I patched upstream as well as the package in rawhide to remove all runtime dependencies on libboost Reopen, something is still dragging boost in :X [root@localhost ~]# rpm -Uhv abiword-2.6.0-3.fc9.i386.rpm error: Failed dependencies: libboost_thread-mt.so.3 is needed by abiword-2.6.0-3.fc9.i386 Fixed. |