Bug 439729
| Summary: | More preferences | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rahul Sundaram <sundaram> |
| Component: | gnome-packagekit | Assignee: | Robin Norwood <robin.norwood> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 9 | CC: | mclasen, richard, smohan |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | MoveUpstream |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-07-04 10:09:15 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Rahul Sundaram
2008-03-31 01:28:31 UTC
I thought of the three checkboxes idea too, but would there ever be a situation where you would want bugfixes but not security updates? Very unlikely. Atleast I can't think of any. The likely options users would want is 1) Just security fixes 2) Both security and bug fixes 3) Everything I've sent a mail to the list, can you folow up there pls. sure. Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping I've asked the interaction people at Red Hat and they seem to think the options we have now are okay. Adding more prefs increases the code paths substantially, and I really want to concentrate on fixing all the existing bugs and use cases. |