Bug 441270

Summary:	Revisor appears to need an obsoletes for revisor-jigdo
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Bruno Wolff III <bruno>
Component:	revisor	Assignee:	Jeroen van Meeuwen <vanmeeuwen+fedora>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	9	CC:	jonathansteffan, vanmeeuwen+fedora
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	2.1.1-6.fc9	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-08-01 22:55:43 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Bruno Wolff III 2008-04-07 14:00:44 UTC

Description of problem:
It appears as if the revsior-jigdo package has been dropped. Most likely it
needs to be obsoleted.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
The problem occured with going from revisor-2.0.5-15.fc9.noarch to
2.1.0-1rc7.fc9.noarch which was blocked by revisor-jigdo-2.0.5-15.fc9.noarch's
dependency on revisor-2.0.5-15.fc9.noarch.

How reproducible:
Seems to be 100%.


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install revisor-2.0.5-15.fc9.noarch and revisor-jigdo-2.0.5-15.fc9.noarch
2. Attempt to update to current rawhide using yum update
3.
  
Actual results:
yum was not able to do the update of revisor.

Expected results:
yum would delete revisor-jigdo-2.0.5-15.fc9.noarch (assuming that it really was
obsoleted) and complete the update.

Additional info:
There might be some other packages (such as revisor-delta) that need similar
treatment.

Comment 1 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 09:02:22 UTC

Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 2 Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-07-31 21:15:50 UTC

I believe this has been resolved in Fedora 8 as well as in Fedora 9. Could you
please confirm?

Comment 3 Bruno Wolff III 2008-08-01 22:17:24 UTC

I tried it out on F9 by uninstalling revisor (yum erase 'revisor*'), getting F8
version of revisor and installing it with rpm (rpm -Uvh
revisor-2.0.4.3-7.fc8.noarch.rpm revisor-comps-2.0.4.3-7.fc8.noarch.rpm
revisor-jigdo-2.0.4.3-7.fc8.noarch.rpm). I then did a yum update and revisor-cli
did appear to replace the obsoleted revisor-jigdo. Some relevant yum output:

Installing:
 revisor-cli             noarch     2.1.1-6.fc9      updates           361 k
     replacing  revisor-jigdo.noarch 2.0.4.3-7.fc8

Updating:
 revisor                 noarch     2.1.1-6.fc9      updates           7.3 k
 revisor-comps           noarch     2.1.1-6.fc9      updates           976 k
Installing for dependencies:
 revisor-gui             noarch     2.1.1-6.fc9      updates           330 k

So I think it looks good.

Comment 4 Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-08-01 22:55:43 UTC

Thank you, I was afraid memory hadn't served me well, or weirdness had been
happening. Thanks again!