Bug 441388

Summary: EPEL Request
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Gideon Mayhak <gnafu_the_great>
Component: inadynAssignee: Jochen Schmitt <jochen>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 8CC: kevin
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-04-28 19:42:17 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Gideon Mayhak 2008-04-07 20:09:05 UTC
Description of problem:
Fedora 8 contains packages of the very useful inadyn application,
but it is not available for EL5.


Additional info:
I use inadyn to update my DynDNS.org account in Fedora 8.  I would like to move
over to a CentOS-based setup for my serving needs.  If inadyn
was available in the EPEL repository, I could more easily transition to a CentOS
environment.  I cannot find inadyn packaged in any EL-compatible repository.

Please tell me if I am way out of line or if this is totally the wrong procedure
for this.  I was looking around and it looked like creating a new "bug" was the
proper procedure for such a request.

Comment 1 Jochen Schmitt 2008-04-08 15:15:03 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: inadyn
New Branches: EL-4 EL-5

Comment 2 Kevin Fenzi 2008-04-08 18:19:45 UTC
cvs done.

Comment 3 Jochen Schmitt 2008-04-10 13:56:41 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: inadyn
New Package Name: inadyn-mt

inady-mt is the succesor of inady.

Comment 4 Kevin Fenzi 2008-04-10 17:39:33 UTC
Did upstream litterally just re-name the package? 
Or is this a new package that took over from the inadyn package? 

For re-names, it's much better (IMHO) to have the new package reviewed and
imported, and then end of life the old package. This will allow people to be
able to find history in CVS, and if upstream changed more than the name it would
allow the package to be reviewed. 

Thoughts?

Comment 5 Gideon Mayhak 2008-04-10 19:39:59 UTC
I just want to say thank you for the work you're doing on this.  I feel honored
to have received such a quick response.

Comment 6 Kevin Fenzi 2008-04-14 16:10:06 UTC
Clearing the cvs flag here for now. 

Jochen: Any reply on comment #4?

Comment 7 Jochen Schmitt 2008-04-28 19:42:17 UTC
I have started a review process for inadyn-mt.