Bug 441388
Summary: | EPEL Request | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Gideon Mayhak <gnafu_the_great> |
Component: | inadyn | Assignee: | Jochen Schmitt <jochen> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 8 | CC: | kevin |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-04-28 19:42:17 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Gideon Mayhak
2008-04-07 20:09:05 UTC
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: inadyn New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 cvs done. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: inadyn New Package Name: inadyn-mt inady-mt is the succesor of inady. Did upstream litterally just re-name the package? Or is this a new package that took over from the inadyn package? For re-names, it's much better (IMHO) to have the new package reviewed and imported, and then end of life the old package. This will allow people to be able to find history in CVS, and if upstream changed more than the name it would allow the package to be reviewed. Thoughts? I just want to say thank you for the work you're doing on this. I feel honored to have received such a quick response. Clearing the cvs flag here for now. Jochen: Any reply on comment #4? I have started a review process for inadyn-mt. |