Bug 441694

Summary: cvs assertion failure
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Reporter: Adam Stokes <astokes>
Component: cvsAssignee: Jiri Moskovcak <jmoskovc>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 4.8CC: dfediuck, jscotka, rvokal, tao
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 769298 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-05-18 20:12:10 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 391511    
Attachments:
Description Flags
mimics upstream fix to remove assert statement none

Description Adam Stokes 2008-04-09 15:03:26 UTC
Description of problem:
CVS fails with assertion error

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
cvs 1.11.17

How reproducible:
100% 

Steps to Reproduce:
1. use cvs rtag
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
cvs: recurse.c:642: do_recursion: Assertion `strstr (repository, "/./") ==
((void *)0)' failed.
cvs [rtag aborted]: received abort signal

Expected results:
No error.

Additional info:
http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-cvs@nongnu.org/msg01157.html

Comment 1 Adam Stokes 2008-04-09 15:03:26 UTC
Created attachment 301822 [details]
mimics upstream fix to remove assert statement

Comment 4 RHEL Program Management 2008-09-05 17:13:47 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 9 Jan Ščotka 2009-01-08 11:32:29 UTC
testcase created in 196259 -  cvs lacks LFS support

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2009-05-18 20:12:10 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0971.html