Bug 441698
| Summary: | Feature: Support async queue replication | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise MRG | Reporter: | Gordon Sim <gsim> | ||||
| Component: | qpid-cpp | Assignee: | Gordon Sim <gsim> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Kim van der Riet <kim.vdriet> | ||||
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | urgent | ||||||
| Version: | beta | CC: | freznice, iboverma | ||||
| Target Milestone: | 1.1.1 | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2009-04-21 16:16:22 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 478882 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Gordon Sim
2008-04-09 15:25:04 UTC
Asynchronous queue replication from one clustered "primary" broker to another clustered "secondary" broker (asynchronous site to site replication). For disaster recovery purposes there is a need to have asynchronous sequential replication of changes (enqueue and de-queue of messages) made to queues on primary broker in one data center to a secondary broker at another data center. Although asynchronous, the updates' sequence should be precisely the same on secondary broker queues as it was on the primary broker queues in the primary site. Transactional changes to the primary broker queues should be applied to secondary broker's queues in the same transactional fashion. Secondary broker queues are not used (no messages are sent to or read from queues) by any AMQP clients until the replica is manually activated in case of a DR. In case of a failure all updates done on primary broker that have not been copied to the secondary broker could be lost due to the asynchronous nature of the replication. Switching the secondary broker to become active in case of DR is manual, in which case it could take some time to recover all the messages for very large queues. Created attachment 329978 [details] Notes on setting up and using the async replication feature This text has also been added to the upstream wiki: http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/queue+state+replication See attachement above for details on this feature. There are also two test scenarios checked in to the qpid svn: * src/tests/replication_test Simple low volume verification of the basic functionality of replication where after configuration messages are sent and acknowleged then the state of the backup queues are validated. Both enqueue-and-dequeue and enqueue-only modes are tested. This is run as part of 'make check'. * src/tests/reliable_replication_test This tests reliability in the face of bridge/link failure. It only deals with the enqueue-only mode as the other functionallity is covered by the test above. During replication of a large volume of messages the link is destroyed then re-created periodically and at the end the test ensures that all expected messages were replicated with no duplications. Should have also added that src/tests/reliable_replication_test is automated as part of 'make check-long' (need to be in src/tests for that). The feature has been implemented and above mentioned tests are passing on RHEL 4.7 / 5.3 i386 / x86_64 on packages: qpidd-0.4.744917-1.el5, rhm-0.4.3116-3.el5, python-qpid-0.4.743856-1.el5 ->VERIFIED An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2009-0434.html |