Bug 441878
Summary: | more unaligned access messages from libnl during install | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Doug Chapman <dchapman> |
Component: | libnl | Assignee: | Dan Williams <dcbw> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | desktop-bugs <desktop-bugs> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 5.2 | CC: | dwa, tgraf |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Regression |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | ia64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-04-10 18:34:36 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Doug Chapman
2008-04-10 17:05:37 UTC
needinfo on tgraf... Thomas; the only change in libnl-1.0-0.10.pre5.5 is the addition of the patch that doug attached to the original libnl unaligned access bug. It's based on libnl-1.0-pre5 with a few patches. I am continuing to debug this issue... I was able to run anaconda's stage one "/sbin/loader" in userspace. So, I built my own copy of anaconda to try to do some debugging but with my binary I do _not_ see the unaligned accesses, but if I run the original binary I do see them. I need to check with release engineering to see if it is possible that last night's anaconda was still built with the older version of libnl somehow. It is statically linked so I don't know how to check this from the binary (if someone has a suggestion please let me know). Ah HA! Anaconda stage 1 is statically linked, it has not been rebuilt since libnl was fixed. This explains why the stage2 messages are resolved, that part of anaconda is dynamicaly linked. Sorry for the noise. |