Bug 442079
Summary: | using kickstart option --ignoredisks to skip redundant SAN paths fails | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Jay Rishel <jay> | ||||
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | low | ||||||
Version: | 5.1 | CC: | jgranado | ||||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2008-06-09 19:12:53 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Jay Rishel
2008-04-11 16:30:38 UTC
Created attachment 302143 [details]
example ks file
Wonder if the san devices are getting added to DiskSet.skippedDisks? Why aren't you using multipath instead of specifying "sda" here? is mpio supported for SAN booting? wasn't able to find that documented. Our current solution is to use EMC's PowerPath after the initial kickstart is complete, but I'd much rather go with mpio, if you can point me in the right direction. With RHEL 5.2, the multipath device should be autodetected and show up as /dev/mapper/mpath0 (with partitions being mpath0p1, mpath0p2, etc.). Is that not working? no, that is not occurring. I just tried replacing the sda references in the ks file with mpath0 and it wouldn't install. This is red hat 5.1. I'll download the 5.2 beta and see if I get the mpio devices. NAKing as we are likely not going to have the capacity to get this fixed in 5.3. Please do try out 5.2 and see if it's working better for you, though, as we think that should be the case. Development Management has reviewed and declined this request. You may appeal this decision by reopening this request. |