Bug 442672

Summary:	Evolution28 needs to build against system nss package in rhel-4.7
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4	Reporter:	Martin Stransky <stransky>
Component:	evolution28	Assignee:	Martin Stransky <stransky>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Matthew Barnes <mbarnes>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	4.7	CC:	kengert
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-04-17 15:44:37 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	442690

Description Martin Stransky 2008-04-16 07:11:37 UTC

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

NSS has been moved from seamonkey to stand-alone package in RHEL-4.7 and updated
to 3.12. All applications what build against it have to be updated.

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2008-04-16 07:49:36 UTC

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 2 Matthew Barnes 2008-04-16 10:17:49 UTC

Cloned this bug for evolution28-evolution-data-server (bug #442690).

Comment 3 Martin Stransky 2008-04-16 16:06:01 UTC

Evolution28 seems to build fine against the new nss/nspr packages. We don't need
to rebuild it then...

Comment 4 Kai Engert (:kaie) (inactive account) 2008-04-17 15:05:53 UTC

Martin, do you want to close this bug?

Comment 5 Martin Stransky 2008-04-17 15:44:37 UTC

Yes, we can close it.