Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||desktop-backgrounds-basic grew by a few megs|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Jeremy Katz <katzj>|
|Component:||desktop-backgrounds||Assignee:||David Zeuthen <davidz>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||mclasen, rdieter, rstrode|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2008-05-01 13:13:03 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Jeremy Katz 2008-04-16 22:16:43 EDT
desktop-backgrounds-basic seems to have grown by a couple of megs with the change in backgrounds which pushes the x86_64 image (which was fitting on a CD) over. Is there any way the images could be a smidge smaller or we could lose one of the aspect ratios?
Comment 1 Matthias Clasen 2008-04-16 23:03:28 EDT
Ray already shrank what we got from the art team. How many megs do we need to shave off ?
Comment 2 Ray Strode [halfline] 2008-04-16 23:14:14 EDT
We did get two background sets for the same aspect ratio (and none for 5:4 oddly enough), so we might be able to drop one of the duplicate sets.
Comment 3 Jeremy Katz 2008-04-16 23:18:32 EDT
Somewhere between 2 and 3 post compression. But the pngs used for backgrounds don't really get compressed by squashfs, so that makes for a pretty direct correlation. And if we can't get it here, I can look for somewhere else tomorrow
Comment 4 Jeremy Katz 2008-04-29 17:01:57 EDT
This is still lingering... a quick test with rm -f /usr/share/backgrounds/.../*normalish* got me back to an okay size, so losing one of the duplicates should do the trick.
Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2008-05-01 13:13:03 EDT
LiveCDs have room to spare as of now. Closing.