Bug 442842

Summary:	Pull /usr/sbin/stunnel3 into seperate package?
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	W. Michael Petullo <mike>
Component:	stunnel	Assignee:	Miloslav Trmač <mitr>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	9
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-05-19 22:33:12 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description W. Michael Petullo 2008-04-17 07:00:39 UTC

Description of problem:
The only thing in the stunnel package that seems to require perl is
/usr/sbin/stunnel3. Can this be put into a seperate package (e.g.,
stunnel-compat) so that the stunnel package may be installed without perl?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
stunnel-4.20-5.ppc

How reproducible:
Every time

Steps to Reproduce:
Install stunnel and not that it pulls in perl.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Miloslav Trmač 2008-04-18 10:39:39 UTC

Thanks for your report.

I'd rather just remove it - making a package for a 3kB file is sort of
ridiculous and stunnel 4.x is more than 5 years old, more than enough time to
migrate.

This can all happen only after Fedora 9 has branched, though.

Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 09:34:25 UTC

Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 3 Miloslav Trmač 2008-05-19 22:33:12 UTC

stunnel3 removed in rawhide stunnel-4.24-2.