Bug 442915
| Summary: | missing dependencies for blas-devel and lapack-devel | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Satish Balay <balay> |
| Component: | lapack | Assignee: | Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 8 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 3.1.1-4.fc9 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-07-09 21:48:44 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Satish Balay
2008-04-17 15:37:43 UTC
Request for libgfortran-devel at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442919 lapack-3.1.1-4.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 lapack-3.1.1-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 lapack-3.1.1-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. lapack-3.1.1-4.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Thanks for fixing this dependency problem. Its appears to work as expected on Fedora9. [I have both x86_64 & i386 libs installed - and both show proper dependencies] Actually I spoke a bit too soon.
This is misbehaving in multilib case.. On attempting to install
lapack-devel.i386 - yum prompts to install blas-devel.x86_64 - instead of
blas-devel.i386
I guess gcc-gfortran.x86_64 is fine - as it provides both 32bit and 64bit
libgfortran.a/so files
******************************************************************************
[root@asterix ~]# yum install lapack-devel.i386
Loaded plugins: changelog, refresh-packagekit
local | 951 B
00:00
Setting up Install Process
Parsing package install arguments
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package lapack-devel.i386 0:3.1.1-4.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: blas-devel = 3.1.1-4.fc9 for package: lapack-devel
--> Running transaction check
---> Package blas-devel.x86_64 0:3.1.1-4.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: gcc-gfortran for package: blas-devel
--> Running transaction check
---> Package gcc-gfortran.x86_64 0:4.3.0-8 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Dependencies Resolved
=============================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
=============================================================================
Installing:
lapack-devel i386 3.1.1-4.fc9 updates 4.1 M
Installing for dependencies:
blas-devel x86_64 3.1.1-4.fc9 updates 182 k
gcc-gfortran x86_64 4.3.0-8 fedora 4.2 M
Transaction Summary
=============================================================================
Install 3 Package(s)
Update 0 Package(s)
Remove 0 Package(s)
Total download size: 8.5 M
Is this ok [y/N]:
I'm not sure I can reasonably resolve this. With the new rpm, I can specify that Requires: foo-devel(x86-32) is what I want, but I can't do this for any existing releases (F-8, F-9). (In reply to comment #8) > I'm not sure I can reasonably resolve this. > > With the new rpm, I can specify that Requires: foo-devel(x86-32) is what I want, > but I can't do this for any existing releases (F-8, F-9). Ok. I guess this new rpm is currently in rawhide and will be in F-10/RHEL6. So this fix to blas/lapack will be in upcoming releases. This is fine by me. Hopefully libgfortran-devel split takes place before that [as per #442919] and blas-devel/lapack-devel packages are updated with this change aswell. |