Bug 442970
Summary: | Need translations for .policy file | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | David Zeuthen <davidz> |
Component: | PackageKit | Assignee: | Robin Norwood <robin.norwood> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | mclasen, rhughes, richard, tim.lauridsen |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-04-22 21:28:27 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
David Zeuthen
2008-04-17 21:51:33 UTC
One idea that has been brought up is to try using transifex for this. Would probably be good for both sides, PackageKit gets translations, and transifex gets a high-profile 'customer'. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/FAQ#add-transifex Isn't this Fedora/Red Hat specific? I'm not that comfortable tying upstream PackageKit into Fedora like that, as the SuSe/Ubuntu guys would have to go through Fedora transifex, which might be politically a hot potato. I've tried really hard to banish the NIH argument for the creation of PackageKit and I'm pretty sure this would reinforce the argument the wrong way. I hear what you are saying, but I think you are being overly cautious. In fact, asking for translations by strangers on your blog is a bit dangerous as you have no chance of verifying them. In contrast to using teams like Transifex, the Ubuntu effort or the gnome i18n team. Maybe I should just have submitted some Danish translations with dirty/abusive content to make a point. Maybe my tirade works better if Richard had added himself to the Cc I've asked for transifex access so we can evaluate this. |