Bug 443264
Summary: | should add itself to Apps -> Add / Remove | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Martin Jürgens <ma> |
Component: | PackageKit | Assignee: | Robin Norwood <robin.norwood> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | richard, tim.lauridsen |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-04-20 18:23:14 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Martin Jürgens
2008-04-19 21:15:48 UTC
No, I think it belongs in System, sorry. I never liked the "in-your-face" pirut application there - we need to get applications to install thier own software, not force the user to. PackageKit isn't a replacement for pirut, it's a new abstract way of installing software. Doesn't Fedora 9 ship with PackageKit by default? I just think that most distros ship their package management apps under Apps -> Add / Remove and it would be good if it would be in the same place for switchers. For the time being apps not installing yet their own software, it would be good to leave it. Otherwise they may think that Fedora does not have a package management gui. Installing new additional software happens often on a system, and many developers are using Fedora. Apps -> Add / Remove are 2 clicks, System -> Administration -> xx are 3. Isn't it all about simplicity? Btw., IMO the software / application installation tool being located under Applications is a little (really only a little bit) more obvious then locating it under System. >Doesn't Fedora 9 ship with PackageKit by default? Yup. >Isn't it all about simplicity? Nope, not when other tools are being developed that will fulfil the "I want this application installed" use case, not the "I want to manage packages" use case. Installing _packages_ is an admin thing, installing _programs_ is a user thing. Well, cleared out on IRC :) |