Bug 443844

Summary: mdadm --scan does not set the mode and can not be the first option
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Reporter: Alexander Todorov <atodorov>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Alexander Todorov <atodorov>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 4.7   
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2008-0653 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-07-24 19:06:25 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
screen shot of the message on tty1 none

Description Alexander Todorov 2008-04-23 17:01:28 UTC
Description of problem:
Installing PV Xen guest for RHEL4.7 leads to the above message on tty1

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
anaconda-10.1.1.86-1

How reproducible:
Xen/PV from NFS

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Start the install and proceed to stage2
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
(warning) message on tty1 that was not there before

Expected results:
no error/warning messages

Additional info:
Such message was not present in previous versions.

Comment 1 Alexander Todorov 2008-04-23 17:01:28 UTC
Created attachment 303525 [details]
screen shot of the message on tty1

Comment 3 David Lehman 2008-04-23 17:45:31 UTC
I think mdadm is not doing anything because we fail to specify the mode. My
impression is that this indicates that bug 185674 is not fixed correctly.

I have a fix ready for anaconda-10.1.1.88-1.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2008-07-24 19:06:25 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0653.html