Bug 444198

Summary:	pk-application unusable at 800x480
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jeremy Katz <katzj>
Component:	gnome-packagekit	Assignee:	Robin Norwood <robin.norwood>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	9	CC:	rhughes, richard, valent.turkovic
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-10-27 13:09:58 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jeremy Katz 2008-04-25 19:20:38 UTC

pk-application isn't really usable at 800x480 which is the resolution used by a
lot of smaller form factor devices.  You can't see the buttons for
remove/install, etc

Comment 1 Richard Hughes 2008-04-26 10:55:54 UTC

It's not really resigned for such small screens - but have you got a screenshot
of what it looks like please?

Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 10:10:39 UTC

Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 3 Brennan Ashton 2008-06-08 01:25:15 UTC

Reporter, could you please reply to the previous question? If you won't reply in
one month, I will have to close this bug as INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Thank you.

Comment 4 Jeremy Katz 2008-06-09 16:30:09 UTC

See http://katzj.fedorapeople.org/gpk-lowres.png

Comment 5 Richard Hughes 2008-06-13 08:35:31 UTC

Do you think we should only set a minimum height if the screen is at least that
size? If we don't set a minimum size, the window comes up very squashed. What do
other apps do?

Comment 6 Jeremy Katz 2008-06-13 12:55:43 UTC

Most apps don't set a minimum size, or if they do, they do one that fits on a
640x480 screen.

Comment 7 Richard Hughes 2008-10-17 17:17:34 UTC

*** Bug 467424 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Richard Hughes 2008-10-17 17:18:44 UTC

I've fixed this upstream in 5d1788f59e2343ea84ec8e75f9016b5eddf80259, they'll be a fixed version in rawhide on Monday.

Comment 9 Valent Turkovic 2008-10-20 07:01:10 UTC

Thanks Richard you are amazing as always!