Bug 444456

Summary:	tftp-tcp_wrappers issue
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Roger Depreeuw <rogdepre>
Component:	tcp_wrappers	Assignee:	Tomas Janousek <tjanouse>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-04-30 08:58:36 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Roger Depreeuw 2008-04-28 14:58:17 UTC

Description of problem:
testing of tftp 
test on localhost very fast and reliable
test on remote timed-out.
Info from tftp on localhost: tftp -V ->tftp-hpa 0.48, without readline.
What is missing is "with tcpwrappers, with remap"
Recompiled tftp from src. Found out in the config.log that tcpd.h is not found.
I believe tcpd.h should be part of tcp_wrappers.rpm, or am i wrong?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
tftp-hpa 0.48

How reproducible:
tftp -V

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
ltsp not functioning

Expected results:
tcpd.h become part of distribution

Additional info:

Comment 1 Tomas Janousek 2008-04-28 15:18:45 UTC

tcpd.h is in tcp_wrappers-devel

Comment 2 Roger Depreeuw 2008-04-28 16:26:01 UTC

Yes found it at rpmfind.net
not found in fedora yum list
and tftp from yum install id done without-tcpwrappers

Comment 3 Tomas Janousek 2008-04-28 22:07:30 UTC

Well, I'm unable to understand what you're trying to say. If you're complaining
that tftp isn't built against tcp_wrappers, then it's its bug and you have to
reassign it to tftp. If you're complaining that applications can't be built
against tcp_wrappers in Fedora, then you're wrong and we'll close the bug. I
doubt you may be complaining about anything else, but if that's the case, please
make the best effort to explain that in English.

Comment 4 Roger Depreeuw 2008-04-29 16:53:30 UTC

Sorry for the confusion,i should have spend more time trying to express myself
better.
Using tcpdump i found out that udp was not defined for port 69 in /etc/services.
and therefore access was denied in iptables.
Once that corrected,ltsp and therefore also tftp started working.I'm able to
perform a pxeboot from 2 thin clients now, one is an old pc, the other one a
diskless PC based on AMD Geode LX700. Great experience running kde4,firefox3...
on an old pc.
My confusion started by comparing the results of "tftp -V" from my fc9 machine
with another ltsp-server (previous version). In order to confirm that I had
probably taking a wrong conclusion, I did a yum reinstall tftp and everything is
still working fine. Therefore this bug can be closed