Bug 445410
Summary: | Review Request: sac - Java standard interface for CSS parser | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Caolan McNamara <caolanm> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Andrew Overholt <overholt> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, fnasser, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | overholt:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-05-09 20:01:14 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Caolan McNamara
2008-05-06 19:00:26 UTC
It's not exactly clear to me if I want e.g. sac for rawhide/F-10 and it's already packaged by jpackage if I should use a n-v-r which is >= the equivalent jpackage n-v-r or not. See this for release numbering: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/JPackagePolicy I'll take this one. The specfile looks fine except for: - fix the release as per the URL in comment #2 - description a bit poorly worded - don't drop the JPackage changelog (if there is one) It sucks that they don't have a build.xml but the simple one written by the JPackage packager is fine. Don't worry about the rpmlint warning about the group. So, how about... http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/jfreereport/sac.spec http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/jfreereport/sac-1.3-3jpp.1.fc9.src.rpm Looks good to me. Approved. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sac Short Description: Java standard interface for CSS parser Owners: caolanm Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes cvs done. |