Bug 445708

Summary:	Review Request: RaptorMenu - Alternate menu for KDE 4.x
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Steven M. Parrish <tuxbrewr>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED DEFERRED	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-package-review, notting, pahan, rdieter
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-08-09 22:32:50 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	446426
Bug Blocks:

Description Steven M. Parrish 2008-05-08 17:28:59 UTC

Spec URL: http://www.mediafire.com/?wmjimmnzpob
SRPM URL: http://www.mediafire.com/?ztnkbrtwhad
Description:Raptor aims to deliver a new kind of launch menu system for KDE. It is designed with usability and beauty in mind.
Raptor-Menu does not try to be the final answer to the menu question, instead aspires to be the best answer we can give, merging many ideas form modern desktop launch menus.

Project website: http://raptor-menu.org

Right now builds for dist-f10.  Since it requires QT4.4 will not currently build for F9 since it has QT4.3, however QT4.4 is a pending update for F9.

Build logs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=600835

Comment 1 Kevin Kofler 2008-05-18 21:07:34 UTC

Shouldn't this depend on KDE41 rather than Qt44? Or does this build against the 
old Plasma in KDE 4.0?

Comment 2 Steven M. Parrish 2008-05-19 01:31:57 UTC

These are the requirements from their website
#  KDE4 Development Packages , which includes kdebase and kdelibs version 4.
# Qt 4.4 or Later 

It successfully built with dist-f10 are the target which I know has qt4.4
already should build against the existing plasma,  As soon as 4.4 makes it into
F9 will be building packages for that dist as well

Comment 3 Kevin Kofler 2008-05-25 05:42:41 UTC

Looks like the reason this doesn't need KDE 4.1 is that this is a pre-alpha 
version which has no Plasma integration at all. Is this really worth packaging?

Comment 4 Steven M. Parrish 2008-05-27 14:51:44 UTC

Once plasma is stable and has support for plugings.  Once upstream has plugin
loading working it will be a plasma-applet

Comment 5 Steven M. Parrish 2008-08-09 22:32:50 UTC

Closing this review request until upstream gets some issues resolved.