Bug 446461

Summary: Upgrade bacula to last mainstream release: 2.2.8
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Gabriele Turchi <turchi>
Component: baculaAssignee: Andreas Thienemann <andreas>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 9CC: adam, benny+bugzilla, ch.nolte, fschwarz, jarod, limburgher, mmcgrath
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-09-15 13:35:06 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:

Description Gabriele Turchi 2008-05-14 13:36:43 EDT
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en; rv:1.9b5) Gecko Fedora/2.22.1.1-1.fc9 Epiphany/2.22

Description of problem:
The mainstream bacula version is in 2.2 step from august, 2007. There is a reason not to upgrade to 2.2?

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1. ...
2.
3.

Actual Results:


Expected Results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Christian Nolte 2008-06-05 12:32:46 EDT
Are there any news on an updated bacula package?
Comment 2 Jarod Wilson 2008-06-09 12:41:13 EDT
ABacula 2.4.0 just released a few days ago...
Comment 3 Jarod Wilson 2008-06-09 16:26:32 EDT
I have reason to believe a bacula 2.4.0 build should hit rawhide in the fairly
near future...
Comment 4 Jon Ciesla 2008-06-16 13:16:32 EDT
(In reply to comment #3)
> I have reason to believe a bacula 2.4.0 build should hit rawhide in the fairly
> near future...

reason to believe, or would like to see? If A.), great.  if B.), I'll consider
co-maintaining. 
Comment 5 Jarod Wilson 2008-06-16 13:40:30 EDT
Reason to believe. I hacked together a 2.4.0 rawhide build that I handed off to
Andreas, which should save him some time when rebasing. It was still in need of
some clean-up though.

nb: I'm not actually a maintainer on the package, just someone who had
need/desire to poke at it for a bit, but Andreas did express desire for a
co-maintainer on irc...
Comment 6 Jon Ciesla 2008-06-16 13:53:26 EDT
I see.  Well, I've made the request in pkgdb.  Once it's approved, I'd be more
than happy to take a look at what you've got.  Seems to me F-9 should move to
2.2.8, as perhaps should F-8, and 2.4.0 for rawhide. 
Objections/suggestions/discussion welcome.
Comment 7 Benny Amorsen 2008-07-15 04:06:25 EDT
The fairly near future does not seem to be arriving... It would be very nice if
Fedora wasn't 2 releases behind on Bacula. Jon Ciesla, you're still stuck in
"Awaiting review"?
Comment 8 Jon Ciesla 2008-07-15 08:06:18 EDT
True. 

I have absolutely no desire to initiate an AWOL Maintainer process, but I am a
bit baffled.  Andreas, would you be so kind as to approve my pkgdb request for
co-maintainership, so I can assist with some of the open bugs for Bacula?
Comment 9 Jon Ciesla 2008-07-25 11:02:07 EDT
FYI, I'm now a comaintainer, starting work on 2.2.8 and 2.4.1. . .
Comment 10 Jarod Wilson 2008-07-25 12:33:32 EDT
Its probably not 100% correct, and Andreas had some things he wanted to
integrate, but I have a working 2.4.1 build I've been using for the past month
and a half or so, which you're free to do with as you please if it helps, or
just ignore it, or whatever... :)

http://wilsonet.com/packages/bacula/bacula-2.4.1-1.src.rpm
Comment 11 Jon Ciesla 2008-07-25 12:43:15 EDT
Grabbed.  Thanks!  I'll at very least refer to it, if not rip it off outright. 
With credit given, naturally. :)
Comment 12 Jon Ciesla 2008-07-29 10:39:39 EDT
Testing my 2.2.8 build now.  If it looks good I'll build this for rawhide and
F-9 updates-testing, then build and test 2.4.1.

Sorry for the delay, my build machine is not the fastest. . .
Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2008-07-31 08:54:11 EDT
bacula-2.2.8-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9
Comment 14 Fedora Update System 2008-07-31 21:47:12 EDT
bacula-2.2.8-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bacula'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-6913
Comment 15 Fedora Update System 2008-08-07 19:59:52 EDT
bacula-2.2.8-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.