Bug 446485

Summary: fedora-devel.list is enabled; everything/updates disabled
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Chris Weyl <cweyl>
Component: fedora-package-config-aptAssignee: Axel Thimm <axel.thimm>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: 9CC: pmatilai, rc040203
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 9-2 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-05-21 11:03:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Proposed fix to devel
none
Proposed fix to fc9 none

Description Chris Weyl 2008-05-14 20:05:37 UTC 
I just installed Fedora 9 (fresh install) on my laptop; first command out of the
box was "yum install apt && apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade"....  Much to
my surprise I was informed that many packages were being replaced....  looking
into it further it turns out rawhide is enabled (in fedora-devel.list); and
core/updates is disabled in the other source files.

This doesn't seem quite right :)

Package version is:

fedora-package-config-apt-8.92-1.noarch
Comment 1 Ralf Corsepius 2008-05-20 10:15:41 UTC 
Created attachment 306102 [details]
Proposed fix to devel
Comment 2 Ralf Corsepius 2008-05-20 10:16:12 UTC 
Created attachment 306103 [details]
Proposed fix to fc9
Comment 3 Ralf Corsepius 2008-05-20 10:18:03 UTC 
OK to commit the fixes above? IMO, this issue is critical enough to apply these
patches under an "obvious bug fix" rule, overruling package ownerships.
Comment 4 Axel Thimm 2008-05-20 15:06:09 UTC 
This has been fixed since 2008-05-17 and is waiting for someone with the proper
permission to let it in.

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/pending/fedora-package-config-apt-9-2
Comment 5 Axel Thimm 2008-05-20 15:10:38 UTC 
Actually I wondered why the build was not mentioned here, I accidentally entered
bug #446385 instead of this bug id, so this bug wasn't notified about the build.
I just fixed it, so it should properly report its update status here (this has
nothing to do with the three day approval stall, though).
Comment 6 Ralf Corsepius 2008-05-20 15:32:26 UTC 
(In reply to comment #5)
> Actually I wondered why the build was not mentioned here, I accidentally entered
> bug #446385 instead of this bug id, so this bug wasn't notified about the build.
Hmm ... I wonder, why I did not see your changes, when writing the patches ... I
could swear any oath, I ran cvs up ... ;)
Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2008-05-21 11:03:11 UTC 
fedora-package-config-apt-9-2 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.