Bug 446622
Summary: | wrong version for config-smart (8.92 instead of 9) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dag <den.mail> |
Component: | fedora-package-config-smart | Assignee: | Axel Thimm <axel.thimm> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | a1tmblwd, s.adam, ville.skytta |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 9-13 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-05-21 10:57:35 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Dag
2008-05-15 12:54:27 UTC
*** Bug 447016 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** fedora-package-config-smart-9-13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 fedora-package-config-smart-9-13 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. *** Bug 447857 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** (In reply to comment #3) > fedora-package-config-smart-9-13 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. fedora-package-config-smart-9-13 is not in either Testing or Updates. Where did the fix go? (In reply to comment #5) > fedora-package-config-smart-9-13 is not in either Testing or Updates. Where did > the fix go? Yes, that's a mystery, but Luke's looking at it. There is a duplicate bug report about this, but closing either reports as duplicates of each other seems wrong (the issue mentioned here in comment #0 was fixed, and the package being stalled somewhere in bodhi/koji paths is a different still open issue). Please comment/watch bug #451204 instead, thanks! |