Bug 448318

Summary:	Not 64 bits clean
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Terje Røsten <terje.rosten>
Component:	libuninum	Assignee:	Terje Røsten <terje.rosten>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	mjg
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	libuninum-2.7-9.fc15	Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-11-25 01:58:44 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Terje Røsten 2008-05-25 20:39:58 UTC

Description of problem:

Library don't seem to be 64 bits clean, strange results on x86_64 host.
Upstream is working on the problem.

Could also improve the package by including the tcl tool.

Comment 1 Terje Røsten 2008-10-07 21:37:30 UTC

Also seems to have problems on sparcv9, breaking msort on sparcv9 too.

Comment 2 John Poelstra 2008-10-15 23:23:19 UTC

This bug has been triaged

Please provide a link to the upstream bug

Comment 3 Terje Røsten 2008-11-11 17:45:38 UTC

Upstream has not implemented support for x86_64. 
This is a bug to track that issue.

Comment 4 Michael J Gruber 2011-10-25 15:36:45 UTC

Debian has a fix for the borked libuninum on x86_64. I ported the patch and cleaned up the spec. Commits on top of our current version can be pulled from

git://fedorapeople.org/~mjg/libuninum

and browsed at

http://fedorapeople.org/gitweb?p=mjg/public_git/libuninum.git;a=summary

Even after a rebuild with this, msort has problems sorting roman numerals such as IX, so msort may have independent issues. But the libuninum fix is worth it nonetheless.

Comment 5 Terje Røsten 2011-10-25 16:16:02 UTC

Great, thanks! 

What is the needed git magic to merge this nice changes?

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2011-10-25 17:44:48 UTC

libuninum-2.7-9.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libuninum-2.7-9.fc15

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2011-10-25 17:44:59 UTC

libuninum-2.7-9.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libuninum-2.7-9.fc14

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2011-10-25 17:45:11 UTC

libuninum-2.7-9.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libuninum-2.7-9.fc16

Comment 9 Michael J Gruber 2011-10-25 17:56:32 UTC

(In reply to comment #5)
> Great, thanks! 
> 
> What is the needed git magic to merge this nice changes?

I see you figured it out ;)

Sorry for the botched version number in the changelog; I got too eager on trimming down the digits in 2.7-7.1...

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2011-10-25 21:44:14 UTC

Package libuninum-2.7-9.fc16:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing libuninum-2.7-9.fc16'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14928
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2011-11-25 01:58:44 UTC

libuninum-2.7-9.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2011-11-25 02:00:54 UTC

libuninum-2.7-9.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2011-11-25 02:06:14 UTC

libuninum-2.7-9.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.