Bug 448362
Summary: | No Visual indication when battery status is critical. abrupt shutdown resulted in USB drive corruption issues | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ravi Srinivasan <ravi2boxster> |
Component: | gnome-power-manager | Assignee: | Richard Hughes <richard> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | madko, rhughes, richard, rw |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-07-14 16:14:02 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Ravi Srinivasan
2008-05-26 08:59:25 UTC
I believe this caused by a bug or a malfunctioning feature in gnome-power-manager. Bug #445927 describes a similar issue (but mixed with potentially defective hardware). On my newly installed Fedora 9 system gnome-power-manager correctly detects a low battery situation but then decides not to execute the corresponding action (warning + suspend/powerdown). At this point the debug log states: "profile is not accurate. Not doing policy action" This happens independently of how the various related gconf keys are set. Unfortunately, this is also true for 'use_time_for_policy' which, if false, I would expect to render the battery profile irrelevant. In Ubuntu this is tracked in Launchpad #135548: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/135548 A proposed patch (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/135548/comments/89) makes gnome-power-manager fall back to percentage based decisions while a new battery profile is built during the course of a certain number of apparently required learning cycles. I'm not sure whether the patch is ready for direct inclusion, but it appears to be a step in the right direction and fixes the problem for me. I can make an i686 RPM with the patch included available if requested. Can you try installing https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5740 and https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5728 and then reboot please. This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |