Bug 448427
| Summary: | Package 'ruby' does not follow multilib conventions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sérgio Durigan Júnior <sergiodj> |
| Component: | ruby | Assignee: | Jeroen van Meeuwen <vanmeeuwen+fedora> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 9 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | ppc64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-07-14 15:39:04 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Hi, Any news/comments about this? Thanks. (In reply to comment #0) > [root@bart ~]# rpm -ivh /home/sergio/rpmbuild/RPMS/ppc64/ruby-* > Preparing... ########################################### [100%] > file /usr/share/doc/ruby-docs-1.8.6.114/ext/dl/dlconfig.rb from install > of ruby-docs-1.8.6.114-1.fc8 conflicts with file from package > ruby-docs-1.8.6.114-1.fc8 pondering to remove or rename that since this is just an example file and contains the architecture-dependent content. there seems to be a plan to ignore such multilib issue for the kind of documentation in rpm itself though. > file /usr/src/debug/ruby-1.8.6.114/ruby-1.8.6-p114/ruby.c from install > of ruby-debuginfo-1.8.6.114-1.fc8 conflicts with file from package > ruby-debuginfo-1.8.6.114-1.fc8 This can be fixed with ifdef'ed. > file /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/created.rid from install of > ruby-ri-1.8.6.114-1.fc8 conflicts with file from package ruby-ri-1.8.6.114-1.fc8 I'm not quite sure if this can be really gone since that contains the timestamp when it's created. which means hard to sync among each architectures. also need to research if there are any Ruby applications referring that value. Hello Akira, I appreciated your answer to the report. Please, let me know if you have some news about it. Thanks! Hi Akira, Any news about it? Thanks! This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. I'm the new maintainer for ruby, is this issue still current? This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 1000 days |
Description of problem ====================== I'm using a biarch PPC64 machine here (64-bit kernel with mixed 32- and 64-bit apps), and I'm building and installing Ruby's RPM (from 'ruby-1.8.6.114-1.fc9.src.rpm', but using Fedora 8). The build process goes well and I have both *.ppc and *.ppc64 RPMs here. The problem occurs when I try to install them in the same machine. I can install every RPM from one arch (e.g., for PPC), but then I'm unable to install the RPMs from the other arch (e.g., for PPC64). Here goes the install log for every PPC RPM: [root@bart ~]# rpm -ivh /home/sergio/rpmbuild/RPMS/ppc/ruby-* Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:ruby-libs ########################################### [ 10%] 2:ruby ########################################### [ 20%] 3:ruby-debuginfo ########################################### [ 30%] 4:ruby-tcltk ########################################### [ 40%] 5:ruby-irb ########################################### [ 50%] 6:ruby-rdoc ########################################### [ 60%] 7:ruby-devel ########################################### [ 70%] 8:ruby-docs ########################################### [ 80%] 9:ruby-mode ########################################### [ 90%] 10:ruby-ri ########################################### [100%] Now, when I try to install the PPC64 RPMs: [root@bart ~]# rpm -ivh /home/sergio/rpmbuild/RPMS/ppc64/ruby-* Preparing... ########################################### [100%] file /usr/share/doc/ruby-docs-1.8.6.114/ext/dl/dlconfig.rb from install of ruby-docs-1.8.6.114-1.fc8 conflicts with file from package ruby-docs-1.8.6.114-1.fc8 file /usr/src/debug/ruby-1.8.6.114/ruby-1.8.6-p114/ruby.c from install of ruby-debuginfo-1.8.6.114-1.fc8 conflicts with file from package ruby-debuginfo-1.8.6.114-1.fc8 file /usr/share/ri/1.8/system/created.rid from install of ruby-ri-1.8.6.114-1.fc8 conflicts with file from package ruby-ri-1.8.6.114-1.fc8 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable) ============================================================ I'm using Fedora 8 to build the RPMs. The SRPM is 'ruby-1.8.6.114-1.fc9.src.rpm'. How reproducible ================ Steps to Reproduce: 1. Generate both *.ppc.rpm and *.ppc64.rpm RPMs for Ruby. 2. Try to install them at the same machine Actual results ============== I receive an error regarding file conflicts for PPC and PPC64 files. This indicates that the package doesn't follow the multilib conventions for Fedora. Expected results ================ The packages should install fine. Additional info =============== To be more specific, the packages that are generating this error message are 'ruby-doc', 'ruby-debuginfo' and 'ruby-ri'.