Bug 449912

Summary:	HWCERT: Wipro Limited NetPowerZ4402-DG
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Ready Certification Tests	Reporter:	Anuj Verma (Kevin) <averma>
Component:	dumpster	Assignee:	Red Hat Hardware Certification <hwcert-reviewers>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Red Hat Hardware Certification <hwcert-reviewers>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	1.0
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
URL:	N.A.
Whiteboard:	Wipro Limited
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-06-04 08:57:34 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Anuj Verma (Kevin) 2008-06-04 08:57:34 UTC

Red Hat Hardware Certification Submitted

Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Version:	5
Make:		Wipro Limited
Model:		NetPowerZ4402-DG Clone
Vendor: 	Wipro Limited
Category:	Server
Reporter:	averma

 *** Initially created as clone of bug #288741 ***

Comment 1 Xu Bo 2008-06-05 03:18:04 UTC

The system configuration of NetPowerZ4402-DG has been listed as below:

======================================================
CPU: 2 Intel Xeon Quad-Core @ 2.93 GHz

MEMORY: 8 GB

STORAGE: LSI 1078 with FUJISTU SAS MAY2073RC 73 GB attached

NETWORK: Dual port Intel 82564EB Gigabit Ethernet Controller

CDROM: Optiarc DV-ROM DDU810A

VIDEO: ATI RN50

USB: 6 ports

CHIPSET: Intel 7300

MOTHERBOARD: S7000FC4UR
======================================================

The system has been CERTIFIED on 64-bit. No optional devices.

Comment 3 Xu Bo 2008-06-05 05:20:40 UTC

Kevin, howdy,

Seems there is a imperfection in our catalog in the process of creating clone.
You see, there is nothing listed in the part of "platform" (actually x86_64
should be) as there is no test result in the original bug#288741 (it's a little
complicated to explain why, you can refer to the comments in it).

I think we need to: open a new entry (done, bug#450072) then post it as
CERTIFIED and submit a comment to clarify this cert is the duplicate one of
original bug#288741.

If you agree with me, I will close this cert to dumpster.

Thanks,
/xu