Bug 449963
Summary: | Bugzilla is not a support tool | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Joel Berman <jberman> |
Component: | rhpl | Assignee: | Chris Lumens <clumens> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 5.2 | CC: | bkearney, jhutar, llim, sghosh, syeghiay |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i686 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-07-20 17:34:10 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Joel Berman
2008-06-04 14:50:59 UTC
This is just a message leak from Fedora, if we think it's worth it (or there are other updates) I have no problem changing it. Who should be generating the new text, docs? This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?". This bugzilla was reviewed by QE as a non-FasTrack request. It has since been proposed for FasTrack. The qa_ack has been reset. QE needs to re-review this bugzilla for FasTrack. I can't find this, but looking at the code I'm pretty sure this is from the rhpl module. via. from rhpl.exception import installExceptionHandler Since all errata are supposed to be filed today and this is requesting a string change in a string that's translatable, we don't really have time to get this done. I'm going to have to move it ahead to 5.6. rhpl is not an approved component for 5.6, moving to 5.7 proposed list. From the long history, it's evident we are never going to get around to fixing this bug. I'm just going to close it out instead. This will not be an issue in RHEL6 because neither rhpl nor pirut exist in that distribution. |