Bug 450345

Summary: Port Dogtag 1.0.0 to Fedora 9 (32-bit i386 & 64-bit x86_64)
Product: [Retired] Dogtag Certificate System Reporter: Matthew Harmsen <mharmsen>
Component: OtherAssignee: Matthew Harmsen <mharmsen>
Status: CLOSED EOL QA Contact: Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 1.0CC: abartlet, benl, bob.lord, cfu, dpal, jgalipea, jmagne, kevinu
Target Milestone: 1.0   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-27 18:33:10 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 453504, 453508    
Bug Blocks:    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Diffs for port to Fedora 9 operating system
none
Updated ALL spec files for Fedora 9 port. none

Description Matthew Harmsen 2008-06-06 20:08:30 UTC
There is a strong community interest in seeing Dogtag 1.0.0 ported to Fedora 9
(32-bit i386 & 64-bit x86_64).

Comment 1 Matthew Harmsen 2008-06-06 20:11:49 UTC
The following files were changed to support these operating systems:

# svn status
M      pki/linux/console/pki-console.spec
M      pki/linux/util/pki-util.spec
M      pki/base/ca/shared/conf/dtomcat5
M      pki/base/tks/shared/conf/dtomcat5
M      pki/base/ocsp/shared/conf/dtomcat5
M      pki/base/kra/shared/conf/dtomcat5


Comment 2 Matthew Harmsen 2008-06-06 20:13:28 UTC
Created attachment 308563 [details]
Diffs for port to Fedora 9 operating system

Comment 3 Jack Magne 2008-06-06 20:17:27 UTC
+jmagne attachment (id=308563)

Comment 4 Matthew Harmsen 2008-06-06 20:22:08 UTC
# svn commit
Sending        pki/base/ca/shared/conf/dtomcat5
Sending        pki/base/kra/shared/conf/dtomcat5
Sending        pki/base/ocsp/shared/conf/dtomcat5
Sending        pki/base/tks/shared/conf/dtomcat5
Sending        pki/linux/console/pki-console.spec
Sending        pki/linux/util/pki-util.spec
Transmitting file data ......
Committed revision 50.


Comment 5 Matthew Harmsen 2008-06-06 20:24:02 UTC
New pre-built packages will be made available to the community as soon as they
have been built and published to http://pki.fedoraproject.org.

Comment 7 Matthew Harmsen 2008-06-09 16:42:51 UTC
Created attachment 308721 [details]
Updated ALL spec files for Fedora 9 port.

Comment 8 Jack Magne 2008-06-09 18:17:48 UTC
+jmagne attachment (id=308721)

Comment 9 Matthew Harmsen 2008-06-09 19:14:48 UTC
# svn status
M      pki/linux/ca/pki-ca.spec
M      pki/linux/tks/pki-tks.spec
M      pki/linux/console/pki-console.spec
M      pki/linux/ocsp/pki-ocsp.spec
M      pki/linux/kra/pki-kra.spec
M      pki/linux/util/pki-util.spec

Sending        pki/linux/ca/pki-ca.spec
Sending        pki/linux/console/pki-console.spec
Sending        pki/linux/kra/pki-kra.spec
Sending        pki/linux/ocsp/pki-ocsp.spec
Sending        pki/linux/tks/pki-tks.spec
Sending        pki/linux/util/pki-util.spec
Transmitting file data ......
Committed revision 51.


Comment 10 Matthew Harmsen 2008-06-09 22:08:02 UTC
Published the following Fedora 9 RPMS to both the 32-bit i386 AND the 64-bit
x86_64 repositories:

pki-ca-1.0.0-6.fc9.noarch.rpm
pki-console-1.0.0-4.fc9.noarch.rpm
pki-kra-1.0.0-2.fc9.noarch.rpm
pki-ocsp-1.0.0-2.fc9.noarch.rpm
pki-tks-1.0.0-2.fc9.noarch.rpm
pki-util-1.0.0-2.fc9.noarch.rpm
pki-util-javadoc-1.0.0-2.fc9.noarch.rpm



Published the following Fedora 9 SRPMS to the Fedora 9 source RPM repository:

pki-ca-1.0.0-6.fc9.src.rpm
pki-console-1.0.0-4.fc9.src.rpm
pki-kra-1.0.0-2.fc9.src.rpm
pki-ocsp-1.0.0-2.fc9.src.rpm
pki-tks-1.0.0-2.fc9.src.rpm
pki-util-1.0.0-2.fc9.src.rpm



Comment 11 Matthew Harmsen 2008-06-10 17:05:32 UTC
Looking back at the installation, it appears that the RA and TPS components may
still need some porting work accomplished for the Fedora 9 platforms.

Comment 12 Andrew Bartlett 2008-06-26 01:04:39 UTC
The RA component won't start on Fedora 9 (perl module path wrong).  Should I
file this in a new bug, or track it here?

Comment 13 Andrew Bartlett 2008-07-01 04:21:57 UTC
I've found and fixed my (first) problem in bug 453504