Bug 450854

Summary:	luci doesn't start because of a missing dep (/usr/bin/dc)
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Fabian Arrotin <fabian.arrotin>
Component:	conga	Assignee:	Ryan McCabe <rmccabe>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	5.2	CC:	bbrock, cluster-maint, ralph
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-01-20 21:55:53 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Fabian Arrotin 2008-06-11 13:04:35 UTC

Description of problem:

on a minimal setup of RHEL 5.2, `yum install luci` on a management station will
download the required rpms but there is a hidden dep (a missing Requires: in the
spec ?) because `service luci start` complains about no /usr/bin/dc (which is
provided by the bc package

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

luci-0.12.0-7

How reproducible:

Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. install a minimal rhel 5.2
2. yum install luci
3. service luci start
  
Actual results:

bc package has to be installed manually

Expected results:

bc package automatically installed through yum

Additional info:

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2008-06-24 16:23:39 UTC

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 2 Brian Brock 2008-07-29 22:33:34 UTC

setting QA_ACK

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2009-01-20 21:55:53 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0196.html