Bug 451052
Summary: | Fedora 8 freeze | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | hicham <hichamlinux> |
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Eric Paris <eparis> |
Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 8 | CC: | jmorris, kernel-maint |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-06-12 17:10:08 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
hicham
2008-06-12 15:56:40 UTC
*** Bug 451051 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** The taint from fglrx isn't a good start. (That module is known to corrupt memory in some cases). Assigning to the selinux devs anyway, in the hope they can get something useful out of this, but my gut reaction from that backtrace is "this is ATI's problem" Yeah, clearly fglrx bug. Nothing we can do here. Aren't capbilities supposed to be between 1 and 64 (32 back in F8?) and these guys are requesting some HUGE number. Nothing we can do, talk to the provider of this binary only code to get it fixed. if I had to guess, I'd say their blob can't cope with 64bit capabilities (which were a recent addition iirc), and it's passing crap in the other 32 bits. -555425744 >> 64 :) I think being built against the broken kernel headers caused this problem. See bug 447518. The solution may be to rebuild the driver against a 2.6.25.6 kernel package. (In reply to comment #0) > > Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): > kernel version Linux laptop 2.6.24.7-92.fc8 > The oops trace says: 2.6.25.4-10.fc8 |