Bug 451108 (.)

Summary: Two "eth10" entries under HARDWARE tab
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: richard golasky <richard_golasky>
Component: system-config-networkAssignee: Harald Hoyer <harald>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 8CC: jmoskovc, linux-bugs
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: vim-latex-1.8.23-6.20110214.1049.git089726a.fc16 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-06-12 22:06:45 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
picture of the two "eth10" entries none

Description richard golasky 2008-06-12 19:50:29 UTC 
Description of problem:

Fedora v8 (2.6..23.1-42.fc8)
DELL PE2950 server
Three Intel Quad Port NICs in Slots 1,2,3 (total of 12 ports)
Two onboard BroadCom LOMs (NICs)
Overall: 14 ethernet ports (12 + 2)
After installating the Intel drivers (v1.2.24  igb), there are two "eth10" 
entries in the HARDWARE tab under the Network Configuration Program.  One shows 
as Intel, and the other as Broadcom.  However, when you look under the DEVICES 
tab, "eth10" is not listed twice.  eth10 should nto be listed twice.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.see above
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 richard golasky 2008-06-12 19:50:29 UTC 
Created attachment 309138 [details]
picture of the two "eth10" entries
Comment 2 richard golasky 2008-06-12 22:06:45 UTC 
Just updated to the latest kernel 2.6.25.4-10.fc8 x86_64 and this appears to 
have fixed the problem.  I no longer see the extra "eth10" entry and I no 
longer see the bnx2 entry under the Hardware tab.  Will keep watch out for this.
Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2011-12-29 16:06:38 UTC 
vim-latex-1.8.23-5.20110214.1049.git089726a.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vim-latex-1.8.23-5.20110214.1049.git089726a.fc15
Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2011-12-29 16:07:34 UTC 
vim-latex-1.8.23-5.20110214.1049.git089726a.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vim-latex-1.8.23-5.20110214.1049.git089726a.fc16
Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2012-01-15 08:52:02 UTC 
vim-latex-1.8.23-6.20110214.1049.git089726a.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vim-latex-1.8.23-6.20110214.1049.git089726a.fc15
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2012-01-15 09:01:39 UTC 
vim-latex-1.8.23-6.20110214.1049.git089726a.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vim-latex-1.8.23-6.20110214.1049.git089726a.fc16
Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2012-01-23 22:02:33 UTC 
vim-latex-1.8.23-6.20110214.1049.git089726a.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2012-01-23 22:05:24 UTC 
vim-latex-1.8.23-6.20110214.1049.git089726a.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.