Bug 451450
Summary: | bind-chroot update overwrites user supplied ROOTDIR setting | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm> |
Component: | bind | Assignee: | Adam Tkac <atkac> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5.2 | CC: | ma, mishu, ovasik, psklenar, ralph, riek, rvokal, tburke |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-01-20 22:16:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 227600 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Axel Thimm
2008-06-14 17:21:20 UTC
Looks like this fix didn't make it into RHEL. I got all my RHEL servers silently knocked out by this upon upgrading from 5.1 -> 5.2. You are right, fix is in Fedora but currently not in RHEL *** Bug 452843 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** This bugzilla has Keywords FutureFeature and thus does not meet the release criteria for FasTrack. This FasTrack request has been denied. This bugzilla must be addressed in a minor release. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?". (In reply to comment #9) > This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for > inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in > the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like > this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your > support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to "?". My developer licenses do not include support or a support representative. Still I think that if a package malfunctions on upgrades due to the user having done allowed customizations to the config files and when this package is as crucial as a domain name server it should be fixed in RHEL5 and not RHEL6. Note that this behaviour has affected production systems that serve name zones. The failure is silent and asynchronous to the upgrade, which makes for access denials to the zone in question after the TTLs expire, which can be up to several days. So adding to the high impact this bug has you also have a lengthy diagnosis as cause and effect are separated. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0246.html |