Bug 451498

Summary: Review Request: ghc-Crypto - Misc Crypto support for GHC Haskell
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Rajesh Krishnan <raj.dev.redhat>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, j, notting
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/Crypto
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-06-17 23:24:11 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
ghc-Crypto-4.1.0-1.spec none

Description Rajesh Krishnan 2008-06-15 00:27:48 UTC 
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
4.1.0


Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Download 
http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/Crypto/4.1.0/Crypto-4.1.0.tar.gz
    to rpmbuild/SOURCES folder.
2.  Copy attached <this-package>-<this-version>.spec to rpmbuild/SPECS folder.
3.  Copy the attached *.patch files to the rpmbuild/SOURCES folder (if any).
3.  Execute:
rpmbuild --clean  --target=$(uname -i) -ba \
    rpmbuild/SPECS/<this-package>-<this-version>.spec
  
Actual results:
--

Expected results:
1. You should see the compiled RPM and SRPM binaries in the respective 
folders.
2. After installing the RPM package, you should be able to import the relevant 
module:
$ ghci
ghci>  :m + <module-name-from-package>


Additional info:
1. The same .SPEC should work for Fedora 9 also (I guess, but I tested only on 
Fedora-8).
Comment 1 Rajesh Krishnan 2008-06-15 00:27:48 UTC 
Created attachment 309380 [details]
ghc-Crypto-4.1.0-1.spec
Comment 2 Jason Tibbitts 2008-06-15 09:41:27 UTC 
Why did you submit more of these after it was requested that you stop to address
the issues that have already been raised?

Honestly unless you are going to post proper packages for review, I am
considering just closing all of these tickets.
Comment 3 Bryan O'Sullivan 2008-06-17 23:24:11 UTC 
I am mass-closing these submissions, as they are completely useless and do not
follow any of the packaging guidelines.  Do not attempt to reopen them.