Bug 451668
| Summary: | Mesa cannot be built for i386 on x86-64 | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor> | ||||||||||
| Component: | mesa | Assignee: | Adam Jackson <ajax> | ||||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||||||
| Priority: | low | ||||||||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | ajax, campbecg, mcepl, mcepl, xgl-maint | ||||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Patch | ||||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2009-11-07 21:41:20 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||
|
Description
Zoltan Boszormenyi
2008-06-16 15:43:30 UTC
Created attachment 309537 [details]
Compile libdricore.so as 32-bit
This patch is conditionally applied by the modified specfile.
Created attachment 309538 [details]
Modified specfile
These two patches fixed compilation as 32-bit on x86-64 for me. Besides any philosophical objection I might have to conditional use of %patch, the libdricore change will break DRI on 64-bit arches, so, no. This really seems like it should be fixed in the mesa configure script to figure out bitness from target rather than host word size. You are part of the X and Mesa developer ring, so please bring up this issue there. Thanks. Until then at least I have a temporary fix for "setarch i386 rpmbuild --target i386 ..." How about using $(CC) $(CFLAGS) ... to compile libdricore.so instead of explicit gcc -m32 ...? This way, the patch can be applied unconditionally and it will still work on 64-bit archs. Created attachment 311662 [details]
Use $(CC) $(CFLAGS) to compile libdricore.so
Created attachment 311663 [details]
Modified specfile, use the new patch
This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Since this bugzilla report was filed, there have been several major updates in various components of the Xorg system, which may have resolved this issue. Users who have experienced this problem are encouraged to upgrade their system to the latest version of their packages (at least F12Beta, but even better if the very latest versions). Please, if you experience this problem on the up-to-date system, let us now in the comment for this bug, or whether the upgraded system works for you. If you won't be able to reply in one month, I will have to close this bug as INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Thank you. [This is a bulk message for all open Fedora Rawhide Xorg-related bugs. I'm adding myself to the CC list for each bug, so I'll see any comments you make after this and do my best to make sure every issue gets proper attention.] Fedora 9 has been deemed officially end of live and due to the fact that this bug wasn't updated beyond version 9 per comment 9, I am closing it with a status of wontfix. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers |