Bug 452418

Summary:	Strange version format in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/devmapper.pc
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component:	lvm2	Assignee:	Alasdair Kergon <agk>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	agk, bmarzins, bmr, dwysocha, heinzm, mbroz, poelstra, prockai
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	EasyFix
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-11-01 20:16:17 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Robert Scheck 2008-06-22 16:04:39 UTC

Description of problem:
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/devmapper.pc contains:

  Version: "1.02.26 (2008-06-06)"

which is a very strange format. Can we please change this to

  Version: 1.02.26

for future packages, please? Thank you. AFAIK the device-mapper is the only
package in the whole Fedora which does such things. Please correct, thanks.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
device-mapper-1.02.26-1

How reproducible:
Everytime, see above.

Actual results:
Strange version format in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/devmapper.pc

Expected results:
Version: 1.02.26 in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/devmapper.pc without any quotation marks

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2008-06-22 16:29:53 UTC

Best fix would be upstream. Downstream suggestion would be:

  sed -e 's/Version: .*/Version: %{device_mapper_version}/' \
    -i $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/libdevmapper.pc

after installation somewhere in %install.

Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2008-06-22 16:31:17 UTC

Ehm...devmapper, not libdevmapper of course, so:

  sed -e 's/Version: .*/Version: %{device_mapper_version}/' \
    -i $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/devmapper.pc

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2008-07-27 14:41:26 UTC

Ping?

Comment 4 Robert Scheck 2008-11-01 18:55:01 UTC

Ping?

Comment 5 Alasdair Kergon 2008-11-01 20:16:17 UTC

Only an upstream patch will be considered of course, not a spec file workaround.

Added DM_LIB_PATCHLEVEL.  Will hit rawhide in f11 rebase.