Bug 452568
Summary: | all X applications fail with X error: cannot find font | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sam Steingold <sds> |
Component: | xorg-x11 | Assignee: | X/OpenGL Maintenance List <xgl-maint> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | fonts-bugs, mcepl |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-06-25 16:50:16 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Sam Steingold
2008-06-23 19:24:50 UTC
xorg-x11-fonts is old and inappropriate for most modern apps (only used by some legacy stuff) Do you actually have any current font package such as dejavu-fonts, dejavu-fonts-experimental or liberation-fonts installed on system? Let's make more explicit test; reporter, could you please post output of the command: rpm -qa \*fonts\* Thank you. $ rpm -qa \*fonts\* fonts-KOI8-R-1.0-10.fc8.noarch fonts-KOI8-R-100dpi-1.0-10.fc8.noarch bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-8.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-cyrillic-7.2-6.fc9.noarch texlive-texmf-errata-fonts-2007-4.fc9.noarch liberation-fonts-1.0-4.fc9.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-75dpi-7.2-6.fc9.noarch ghostscript-fonts-5.50-18.fc8.noarch dejavu-lgc-fonts-2.24-3.fc9.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-Type1-7.2-6.fc9.noarch mplayer-fonts-1.1-3.0.rf.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-75dpi-7.2-6.fc9.noarch mathml-fonts-1.0-21.fc6.noarch fonts-hebrew-0.101-2.fc8.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-misc-7.2-6.fc9.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-100dpi-7.2-6.fc9.noarch texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-22.fc9.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-truetype-7.2-3.fc8.noarch urw-fonts-2.4-5.fc9.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-75dpi-7.2-6.fc9.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-15-100dpi-7.2-6.fc9.noarch culmus-fonts-0.101-4.fc8.noarch xorg-x11-fonts-ISO8859-1-100dpi-7.2-6.fc9.noarch bitmap-fonts-0.3-5.2.fc9.noarch $ specific errors: The program 'nautilus' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadName (named color or font does not exist)'. (Details: serial 264 error_code 15 request_code 45 minor_code 0) (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.) Window manager warning: xserver doesn't have 'fixed' font. Bug in window manager: Unexpected X error: BadName (named color or font does not exist) serial 209 error_code 15 request_code 45 minor_code 0) Locking assertion failure. Backtrace: #0 /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0 [0xa75767] #1 /usr/lib/libxcb-xlib.so.0(xcb_xlib_lock+0x2e) [0xa7590e] #2 /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 [0xac8109] #3 /usr/lib/libX11.so.6(XUngrabPointer+0x25) [0xabdd55] #4 /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0(gdk_display_pointer_ungrab+0xba) [0x25d3f54] #5 /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0(gdk_pointer_ungrab+0x1c) [0x25aadd9] #6 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so [0x15036e] #7 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so(_ZN15google_breakpad16ExceptionHandler21InternalWriteMinidumpEijPP10sigcontext+0x43) [0x150893] #8 /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so(_ZN15google_breakpad16ExceptionHandler15HandleExceptionEi+0xa3) [0x150e23] #9 [0x110420] #10 /lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x188) [0x7b4028] #11 metacity [0x807dbc6] #12 metacity [0x80675e2] #13 /usr/lib/libX11.so.6(_XError+0x109) [0xac0a49] #14 /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 [0xac8ac8] #15 /usr/lib/libX11.so.6(_XEventsQueued+0x55) [0xac9435] #16 /usr/lib/libX11.so.6(_XFlush+0x42) [0xac94c2] #17 /usr/lib/libX11.so.6(XFlush+0x31) [0xaa0b41] #18 metacity [0x807661f] #19 metacity [0x8077791] That makes it an xorg problem (I think) |