Bug 452637 (FE-ExcludeArch-IA64)

Summary: ExcludeArch tracker for IA64
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: David Woodhouse <dwmw2>
Component: distributionAssignee: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: dcantrell, prarit, rvokal
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Tracking
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: ia64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-01-20 04:27:31 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On: 163350, 461342, 468244, 469057    
Bug Blocks:    

Description David Woodhouse 2008-06-24 07:53:25 UTC
From the package review guidelines:
---
MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch needs to have a bug filed
in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work
on that architecture. The bug number should then be placed in a comment, next to
the corresponding ExcludeArch line. New packages will not have bugzilla entries
during the review process, so they should put this description in the comment
until the package is approved, then file the bugzilla entry, and replace the
long explanation with the bug number.
---
This Bug is used as a tracker for such issues. If you added a bug for a package
that uses ExcludeArch mark is as blocking this bug. If it's unlikely that the
issue is ever fixed feel free to close the bug directy after reporting.
Otherwise leave it open.

Comment 1 David Lawrence 2008-06-24 14:54:54 UTC
Not sure why I am the default assignee for the 'general' component but this bug
will need to be reassigned to someone who is able to look at this. Any ideas on
whom that may be?

Thanks
Dave

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2010-01-20 04:27:31 UTC
ia64 is inactive, per the wiki. Closing.