Bug 452778
Summary: | does not update all available packages | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
Component: | gnome-packagekit | Assignee: | Robin Norwood <robin.norwood> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 10 | CC: | richard |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-12-08 12:59:38 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jens Petersen
2008-06-25 01:54:22 UTC
Does "pkcon update" include all the updates? After you've done that - does "pkcon get-updates" print anything? Hmm so I could be wrong now: I just tried in an install of rawhide from a tree of 27June and it seems there were two packages uninstalled when I updated to latest rawhide because of broken dependencies. Is there some way for the UI to say these packages were installed and can't be installed currently because of broken deps? So now I am not sure if this is what I have been seeing all along, but I think in the past it could not always have been broken deps for fedora updates. I'll try to keep a eye on this going on and use pkcon. Just to clarify, thanks I used pkcon to work out the above. Though I have noticed such bad deps through PK before specially with rawhide. (In reply to comment #2) > [..] to say these packages were *not* installed and can't be [..] Right, you should have gotton a warning about the packages in the final screen of the update viewer. Could you try again and grab the output from "pkmon" and "gpk-update-viewer --verbose" -- thanks. I think we can probably close this for now since I am not seeing this problem anymore so I assumed it is already fixed. I wonder if there is some way for the applet to wake up with desktop activitiy faster - it sometimes seems to take a long time, even hours, before notifying about available updates? Is that a related known issue? PackageKit-0.3.10-1.fc9,gnome-packagekit-0.3.10-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-0.3.10-1.fc9,gnome-packagekit-0.3.10-1.fc9 PackageKit-0.3.10-1.fc9, gnome-packagekit-0.3.10-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update PackageKit gnome-packagekit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9573 PackageKit-0.3.10-2.fc9, gnome-packagekit-0.3.10-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update PackageKit gnome-packagekit'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9573 This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping PackageKit-0.3.10-2.fc9, gnome-packagekit-0.3.10-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |