Bug 452782
Description
Caius Chance
2008-06-25 04:53:27 UTC
The fonts were compared with OpenOffice the other day but there are certain glyph displacements. Tested with gedit again with smoothing and hinting off, there are no differences on glyphs. The glyph differences might be coming from rendering engines. Created attachment 310226 [details]
Rendering of ver 1.03 by gedit.
Created attachment 310227 [details]
Rendering of ver 1.04 by gedit.
Created attachment 310228 [details]
Comparison of ver 1.03 and 1.04.
Created attachment 310229 [details]
Rendering of ver 1.03 by gedit. (smoothing + hinting on)
Created attachment 310230 [details]
Rendering of ver 1.04 by gedit. (smoothing + hinting on)
Created attachment 310231 [details]
Comparison of ver 1.03 and 1.04. (smoothing + hinting on)
Created attachment 310232 [details]
Test Case in OpenOffice format.
Created attachment 310233 [details]
Test Case in plain text.
Created attachment 310407 [details]
Test sample with no hinting no smoothing.
These samples proved the glyphs has no difference when no hinting and no
smoothing.
To test, simply put the picture of one version on another in GIMP, set "layer
mode" of the upper layer as "Difference".
If there is any pixel differences such pixels will be in white color (which is
"1" in XOR / with differece). Otherwise, pixels will be in black color (which
is "0" in XOR / no difference).
Created attachment 310410 [details]
Test sample with full hinting and subpixel smoothing.
Test with/without hinting and smoothing on gedit. There is no difference found in results (see comment #10 comment #11). |