Bug 452871
Summary: | Provide sysprof for Fedora9+ | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Clemens Eisserer <linuxhippy> |
Component: | sysprof | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-06-25 15:04:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Clemens Eisserer
2008-06-25 14:50:57 UTC
sysprof requires a kernel module, and out-of-tree kernel modules are barred by Fedora policy. The plan was to move it to livna/rpmfusion but that doesn't seem to have happened yet. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewcvs/rpms/sysprof/F-9/dead.package?view=markup See also this thread: http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-December/msg01668.html Thanks for the explanation. should I file a bug at livna? Clemens |