Bug 453771

Summary:	segfault in dm_hash_iter()
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Milan Broz <mbroz>
Component:	device-mapper	Assignee:	Milan Broz <mbroz>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Cluster QE <mspqa-list>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	5.2	CC:	agk, christophe.varoqui, dwysocha, edamato, egoggin, heinzm, jbrassow, junichi.nomura, kueda, lmb, mbroz, prockai, pvrabec, tranlan
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-01-20 21:57:45 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Milan Broz 2008-07-02 13:27:40 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #450474 +++
RHEL5 clone

device-mapper segfaults with new lvm2 build

New lvm2 build requires device-mapper dm_hash_iter to be safe againts deletion
of list member during iteration.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2008-07-02 13:53:30 UTC

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 3 Milan Broz 2008-07-03 08:21:39 UTC

Fixed in device-mapper-1.02.27-1.el5.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2009-01-20 21:57:45 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0200.html