Bug 454293
Summary: | tbb: ldconfig complaints about non-symlinks | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jerry James <loganjerry> |
Component: | tbb | Assignee: | Petr Machata <pmachata> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | mnewsome |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-07-14 18:16:22 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jerry James
2008-07-07 15:08:25 UTC
Strange. Here's what I see (edited to fit to width): # ls -l /usr/lib/libtbb* 1 root root 17 2008-07-07 18:08 /usr/lib/libtbbmalloc.so -> libtbbmalloc.so.2 1 root root 14508 2008-06-13 15:09 /usr/lib/libtbbmalloc.so.2 1 root root 11 2008-07-07 18:08 /usr/lib/libtbb.so -> libtbb.so.2 1 root root 97416 2008-06-13 15:09 /usr/lib/libtbb.so.2 I downloaded the devel x8664 package from koji and extracted it: $ ls -l usr/lib64/libtbb* 1 ant ant 17 2008-07-07 18:07 usr/lib64/libtbbmalloc.so -> libtbbmalloc.so.2 1 ant ant 11 2008-07-07 18:07 usr/lib64/libtbb.so -> libtbb.so.2 So that puzzles me a bit... what does rpm -V say? Does reinstalling make the problem go away? Oh, I'm rereading your report... there /is/ no libtbb.so.2.1. There's just libtbb.so.2. There was no binary incompatibility since 2.0, so the soname can stay the same. Regardless of that, I can't reproduce your problem. ldconfig is quiet. This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |