Bug 454506
Summary: | BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Steve Grubb <sgrubb> |
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | c.shoemaker |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-05-28 18:34:47 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Steve Grubb
2008-07-08 21:21:35 UTC
/usr/src/debug////////kernel-2.6.25/linux-2.6.25.x86_64/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S:327 ffffffff8100c01b: 4c 8b 3c 24 mov (%rsp),%r15 ffffffff8100c01f: 4c 8b 74 24 08 mov 0x8(%rsp),%r14 ffffffff8100c024: 4c 8b 6c 24 10 mov 0x10(%rsp),%r13 ffffffff8100c029: 4c 8b 64 24 18 mov 0x18(%rsp),%r12 ffffffff8100c02e: 48 8b 6c 24 20 mov 0x20(%rsp),%rbp <===== ffffffff8100c033: 48 8b 5c 24 28 mov 0x28(%rsp),%rbx ffffffff8100c038: 48 83 c4 30 add $0x30,%rsp tracesys: SAVE_REST movq $-ENOSYS,RAX(%rsp) /* ptrace can change this for a bad syscall */ FIXUP_TOP_OF_STACK %rdi movq %rsp,%rdi call syscall_trace_enter LOAD_ARGS ARGOFFSET /* reload args from stack in case ptrace changed it */ RESTORE_REST <===== cmpq $__NR_syscall_max,%rax ja int_ret_from_sys_call /* RAX(%rsp) set to -ENOSYS above */ movq %r10,%rcx /* fixup for C */ call *sys_call_table(,%rax,8) movq %rax,RAX-ARGOFFSET(%rsp) /* Use IRET because user could have changed frame */ Either your processor is failing/overheating or something very strange is going on. That instruction should access address ffff8100749a7f78 ... and the previous instruction successfully accessed memory 8 bytes below that. Hard to say if its failing. This is the only Oops/BUG I've seen since I've owned it. It is an AMD 9600, but its not overclocked. Hmm...will watch for other strangeness. Thanks for the analysis. Steve, how did things work out with that hardware? Did you ever see this again? Since reporting the bug, I have changed hardware and am now using F-10. So, I no longer see the problem. This bug can be closed unless anyone really wants it open for some reason. |