Bug 454621 (CVE-2008-2929)

Summary: CVE-2008-2929 Directory Server: multiple XSS issues
Product: [Other] Security Response Reporter: Tomas Hoger <thoger>
Component: vulnerabilityAssignee: Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: unspecifiedCC: anguyen, ckannan, nhosoi, nkinder, rmeggins
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-03-26 14:46:24 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 245248, 454658, 454660    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Tomas Hoger 2008-07-09 12:59:15 UTC
It was discovered that multiple CGI scripts used by Red Hat / Fedora Directory
Server did not properly sanitize %-escaped inputs, resulting in a possibility to
conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.

Issue was caused by a flow in an adminutil library that contain common
functionality used by multiple CGI scripts, such as affected GET / POST argument
parsing.

Issue is know to affect some Administration Express scripts and Directory Server
Gateway (DSGW) scripts.

Affected version:
Red Hat Directory Server 7.1
Red Hat Directory Server 8 (flaw limited to Administration Express issues, as
DSGW component is not shipped)
Fedora Directory Server

Comment 3 Tomas Hoger 2008-08-27 20:17:41 UTC
Lifting embargo.

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2008-09-10 06:50:01 UTC
adminutil-1.1.7-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2008-09-10 07:18:16 UTC
adminutil-1.1.7-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 6 Vincent Danen 2013-03-26 14:46:24 UTC
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Red Hat Directory Server v8 EL4
  Red Hat Directory Server v8 EL5

Via RHSA-2008:0601 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0601.html

Comment 7 Vincent Danen 2013-03-26 14:47:50 UTC
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Red Hat Directory Server v7.1

Via RHSA-2008:0596 http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2008-0596.html