Bug 454644
| Summary: | GtkTreeView::odd_row_color definition in gtkrc is wrong | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Pavel Alexeev <pahan> |
| Component: | gtk-nodoka-engine | Assignee: | Martin Sourada <martin.sourada> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 9 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 0.7.1-1.fc9 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-08-01 01:46:53 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Pavel Alexeev
2008-07-09 14:53:16 UTC
Hi, thanks for the report. Strange enough, I am not able to reproduce the issue on my laptop. Could you find a software that is available in Fedora repos that suffers this issue for you? I see nothing wrong with the definition :-/ Also, there should be no harm from commenting that line out - I will probably do that in the next nodoka release. That would definitely fix this bug, I don't recall why did we added this definition in the past (IIRC it was in the first gtkrc of Nodoka ever, even before we forked the murrine engine)... Hi, Martin Sourada. (In reply to comment #1) > Could you find a software that is available in Fedora repos that > suffers this issue for you? Sure! Each gtk-software with tree widget. For example, to reproduce: Run gtk-demo from gtk2-devel package, and run any example from "Tree View" submenu. For example first: "Editable Cells". End error fire. And excuse me for first example, just I'm working to pack guake (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189). > Also, there should be no harm from commenting that line out - I will probably > do that in the next nodoka release. That would definitely fix this bug, > I don't recall why did we added this definition in the past (IIRC it was in > the first gtkrc of Nodoka ever, even before we forked the murrine engine)... As I can understand it must set shade of odd rows in tree widgets. Are you sure that it will be safely removed? (In reply to comment #2) > Hi, Martin Sourada. > > Sure! Each gtk-software with tree widget. > For example, to reproduce: > Run gtk-demo from gtk2-devel package, and run any example from "Tree View" > submenu. For example first: "Editable Cells". > End error fire. > Would be nice if it were the case, however for me it works fine, without any problems :-/ (even though I run the app from terminal). Could you list you gtk2 and gtk-nodoka-engine NVR (name version release)? It seems to me like some misconfiguration on you computer... > And excuse me for first example, just I'm working to pack guake > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450189). > Aah, that explains, why I didn't find it in the repos :) > > Also, there should be no harm from commenting that line out - I will probably > > do that in the next nodoka release. That would definitely fix this bug, > > I don't recall why did we added this definition in the past (IIRC it was in > > the first gtkrc of Nodoka ever, even before we forked the murrine engine)... > As I can understand it must set shade of odd rows in tree widgets. Are you sure > that it will be safely removed? > The defaults seem to be sane enough. Clearlooks does not set this either. You can try it out by copying the /usr/share/themes/Nodoka to ~/.themes/NodokaTEST (for example), commenting out (use # for comments) the line in ~/.themes/NodokaTEST/gtk-2.0/gtkrc and selecting NodokaTEST as Controls theme in the Appearance caplet. (In reply to comment #3) > Would be nice if it were the case, however for me it works fine, without any > problems :-/ (even though I run the app from terminal). Hmm, strange enough, on my computer it 100% reproducible. > Could you list you gtk2 > and gtk-nodoka-engine NVR (name version release)? It seems to me like some > misconfiguration on you computer... [pasha@x-www temp]$ rpm -qa 'gtk*' gtk+-1.2.10-61.fc9.i386 gtkhtml3-3.18.2-1.fc9.i386 gtkspell-2.0.11-8.fc9.1.i386 gtk2-devel-2.12.10-5.fc9.i386 gtk2-engines-2.14.2-1.fc9.i386 gtk2-2.12.10-5.fc9.i386 gtksourceview-1.8.5-4.fc9.i386 gtkhtml2-2.11.1-3.fc9.i386 gtkmm24-devel-2.12.7-1.fc9.i386 gtk-nodoka-engine-0.7.0-1.fc9.i386 gtkmm24-2.12.7-1.fc9.i386 gtk-doc-1.9-4.fc9.noarch gtkhtml3-devel-3.18.2-1.fc9.i386 I'm update system now, current NVR: [root@x-www yum.repos.d]# rpm -qa 'gtk*' gtk+-1.2.10-61.fc9.i386 gtkspell-2.0.11-8.fc9.1.i386 gtk2-engines-2.14.3-1.fc9.i386 gtksourceview-1.8.5-4.fc9.i386 gtkhtml2-2.11.1-3.fc9.i386 gtk2-2.12.11-1.fc9.i386 gtkhtml3-3.18.3-1.fc9.i386 gtkmm24-devel-2.12.7-1.fc9.i386 gtk-nodoka-engine-0.7.0-1.fc9.i386 gtkmm24-2.12.7-1.fc9.i386 gtk-doc-1.9-4.fc9.noarch gtk2-devel-2.12.11-1.fc9.i386 gtkhtml3-devel-3.18.3-1.fc9.i386 Problem still persist. Indeed strange issue. I've removed the said line and we'll see if it solves the problem. I'll release upstream bugfix release and build a fedora package later today. gtk-nodoka-engine-0.7.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9 gtk-nodoka-engine-0.7.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gtk-nodoka-engine'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-6688 gtk-nodoka-engine-0.7.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |