Bug 455098

Summary:	LTC:4.8:201716:Java 5 SR7 for RHEL 4.8
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4	Reporter:	IBM Bug Proxy <bugproxy>
Component:	releng	Assignee:	Nick Petrov <npetrov>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	4.8	CC:	atodorov, borgan, bpeters, cward, dmach, dmair, herrold, jjarvis, mikem, patrickm, rbiba, riek
Target Milestone:	rc	Keywords:	ZStream
Target Release:	4.8
Hardware:	All
OS:	All
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-05-28 11:28:41 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	452249, 458123, 479851

Description IBM Bug Proxy 2008-07-11 22:20:22 UTC

=Comment: #0=================================================
Emily J. Ratliff <emilyr.com> - 2008-07-11 16:42 EDT
1. Feature Id:	[201716]
Feature Name:	Java 5 SR7 for RHEL 4.8
Sponsor:	SWG - Java
Category:	SWG
Request Type:	Package - Feature from IBM

2. Short Description
Java 1.5 SR7 for RHEL 4.8

3. Business Case
Need to update the Java version in order to have the latest fixes in the RHEL 4 stream


4. Sponsor Priority	1
IBM Confidential:	no
Code Contribution:	IBM code
Upstream Acceptance:	Accepted
Component Version Target:	Java 1.5 SR7
Performance Assistance:	

5. PM Contact:	Stephanie Glass, sglass.com, 512-838-9284

6. Technical contact(s):

David J Edwards, david_edwards.com

Comment 1 John Jarvis 2008-07-14 13:39:33 UTC

IBM, what is the projected delivery date for this code?

Comment 2 IBM Bug Proxy 2008-07-18 17:10:33 UTC

------- Comment From sglass.com 2008-07-18 13:08 EDT-------
This version should be available by the end of next week or beginning of the
next.

Comment 3 Lillian Angel 2008-07-18 17:26:10 UTC

David says SR8 will be out next week. Should we wait for this?

Comment 4 Lillian Angel 2008-07-18 17:26:28 UTC

SR7 is available now.

Comment 6 IBM Bug Proxy 2008-07-18 17:50:41 UTC

------- Comment From sglass.com 2008-07-18 13:46 EDT-------
Lillian, if you can wait until next week, it would be better to go with SR8.

Comment 8 IBM Bug Proxy 2008-08-05 14:42:38 UTC

Moving to Accepted state as this is in RH cvs tree

Comment 18 IBM Bug Proxy 2009-03-13 13:22:36 UTC

An update from system-x distro team:

Java5 SR9 (32-bit) shipped with RHEL4.8-Alpha has been successfully tested using JGrinder test suite.
We will be testing 64-bit Java5 SR9 on a RHEL4.8-Beta kernel & update the results soon.

Thanks!

Comment 19 IBM Bug Proxy 2009-03-16 19:12:08 UTC

Update from LoP test team:

Java5 (build pxp32dev-20081129 (SR9-0 )) shipped with RHEL4.8-Beta has passed tests using jltf test suite and specjbb.

Thanks,

Comment 20 IBM Bug Proxy 2009-03-16 19:40:32 UTC

Just FYI:

- Tests from Lucio's comment were run in a JS12 machine.
- RHEL4.8-Beta only delivers 32-bit JVMs for ppc.

Comment 21 John Jarvis 2009-03-16 21:44:48 UTC

64-bit Java packages for Power are missing, flipping to FAILS_QA to get this fixed.

Comment 22 Nick Petrov 2009-03-17 13:15:35 UTC

ppc64 are now on RHN beta channel

Comment 23 John Jarvis 2009-03-17 13:47:37 UTC

These should also go onto the ISOs in addition to being on RHN.

Comment 24 John Jarvis 2009-03-17 16:53:00 UTC

The PPC64 version will be RHN only. The LACD cannot be multilib -- the installer
will not support it.

Comment 25 IBM Bug Proxy 2009-03-24 17:30:26 UTC

------- Comment From iranna.ankad.com 2009-03-24 13:25 EDT-------
(In reply to comment #10)
> An update from system-x distro team:
>
> Java5 SR9 (32-bit) shipped with RHEL4.8-Alpha has been successfully tested
> using JGrinder test suite.
> We will be testing 64-bit Java5 SR9 on a RHEL4.8-Beta kernel & update the
> results soon.
>
> Thanks!
>

Successfully tested 64-bit version of Java5 SR9 using JGrinder test suite on RHEL4.8-beta kernel. No issues on System-x platform.

Thanks!

Comment 26 Ludek Smid 2009-05-28 11:28:41 UTC

See comment #25