Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm>|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||rawhide||CC:||fedora-package-review, lemenkov, notting, opensource, sundaram|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2010-01-25 19:07:44 EST||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Dave Malcolm 2008-07-15 18:27:18 EDT
Comment 1 Rahul Sundaram 2008-07-20 22:29:50 EDT
The spec claims it is BSD but YUL itself uses other components under different licenses and the combined code cannot be called BSD. You probably need to split up the individual portions (such as JSON code from Adobe licensed under MIT) and package them separately and add a build requires from the main package.
Comment 2 Rakesh Pandit 2008-08-24 02:01:18 EDT
@Dave Are you willing to continue ? Any updates? The ticket is stalled. It has been 1 month +, I am putting it 'need info'.
Comment 3 Peter Lemenkov 2009-02-16 13:33:48 EST
Comment 4 Dave Malcolm 2009-02-16 19:32:18 EST
Sorry for dropping this. I believe the code in question (the as-docs and as-src subdirectories) is ActionScript, and I don't know if we've got any way of running this within Fedora as is. Do I need to delete the non-BSD code from the source zipfile, or can I simply delete it during the build process?
Comment 5 Rahul Sundaram 2009-02-16 21:36:12 EST
As long as the source is distributable, it is ok to delete files during the build process.
Comment 6 Till Maas 2009-04-18 10:52:14 EDT
Please clear NotReady from the Whiteboard when this review request is ready for a review.
Comment 7 Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-25 19:07:44 EST
This has been marked as not being ready for most of a year now. I'm just going to close this out.