Bug 455558
| Summary: | Review Request: udns - DNS resolver library for both synchronous and asynchronous DNS queries | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Adrian Reber <adrian> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Benjamin Krill <ben> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, jima, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | ben:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-01-23 10:07:13 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 480335 | ||
|
Description
Adrian Reber
2008-07-16 07:45:40 UTC
looks good. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: udns Short Description: DNS resolver library for both synchronous and asynchronous DNS queries Owners: adrian Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: ben Cvsextras Commits: yes cvs done. Did anyone happen to notice that this package creates a file conflict with rblcheck? (/usr/bin/rblcheck) This doesn't really feel like much of a review. (In reply to comment #4) > Did anyone happen to notice that this package creates a file conflict with > rblcheck? (/usr/bin/rblcheck) This doesn't really feel like much of a review. I also received the file conflicts mail. From the changelog it looks like you are the maintainer of the rblcheck rpm. My first thought was to just remove the rblcheck binary from udns, because udns is only needed as a library for jabberd and the rblcheck from udns is not really needed. The file conflict has been resolved a few months ago. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: udns New Branches: EL-5 Owners: adrian ben cvs done. |