Bug 45566
| Summary: | Name oops | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Michal Jaegermann <michal> |
| Component: | redhat-release | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
| Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 7.1 | CC: | rvokal |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | alpha | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2001-06-22 21:57:22 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Michal Jaegermann
2001-06-22 20:47:51 UTC
It doesn't here. Are you sure you didn't upgrade from a previous beta that had the same version? Yes, I did an upgrade. Sounds like I should have look further but after checking MD5SUMS, installation dates and version information I goot convinced that I have the right one. Oops myself. How many other surprises of that sort I can expect? I don't know. But I checked the one on the ISO image, the shipped version says the right thing. As an aside, I think this is the first bug reported against redhat-release that had to do with the actual package. :) |