Bug 455881

Summary: nspluginwrapper out of sync with security updates for xulrunner
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michal Jaegermann <michal>
Component: nspluginwrapperAssignee: Martin Stransky <stransky>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 9CC: caillon, wtogami
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-07-18 16:28:26 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Michal Jaegermann 2008-07-18 15:56:29 UTC
Description of problem:
nspluginwrapper-1.1.0-2.fc9, with a build date "Tue 15 Jul 2008"
has a specific requirement for "gecko-libs = 1.9".  A _security_
update to xulrunner-1.9.0.1-1.fc9, dated "Wed 16 Jul 2008"
provides "gecko-libs = 1.9.0.1".

The net effect is that on x86_64 installation yum updates to
xulrunner to 1.9.0.1-1.fc9.x86_64 and, in order to satisfy
dependencies, to 1.9-1.fc9.i386 thus making a mess and invalidating
this security update which was supposed to happen.  It looks like
that for i386 this update will just fail (not tested).

As an extra attraction with xulrunner-1.9-1.fc9.i386 installed
'rpm -Fvh xulrunner-1.9.0.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm' just returns silently,
while one would expect an attempt to update and complaints about
dependencies, suggesting that something is wrong with an ordering.
'rpm -Uvh --oldpackage xulrunner-1.9.0.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm' indeed
comes back with "error: Failed dependencies:" unappy about
gecko-libs for both x86_64 and i386 variants of nspluginwrapper.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
nspluginwrapper-1.1.0-2.fc9
xulrunner-1.9.0.1-1.fc9

Comment 1 David Juran 2008-07-18 16:28:26 UTC
I believe this is a duplicate of bug 455803

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 455803 ***